Thursday, September 22, 2016

Major Contradictions in WAI 88 & 89 Claims Document

Ngati Maru, Tama and Mutunga WAI 88 & 89 Claims reports submitted with unsubstantiated,  severely flawed historical content.   Filed by barrister Moana Sinclair.
Not only do reports contradict one another but show the intent of multiple deceptions and false history.  Filed by the Parata new Trust for WAI 88 & 89.
All Ngaatiawa can say is in the end, the truth will get revealed.  No one will be left behind no matter what their personal judgements are of others.  The activation of exclusion is a wrongful act against all Human Rights.  
To often the word Kotahitanga is used as a political tool to oppress the displaced and disenfranchised.
DOCUMENTS UPLOADED:
WAI 2200 - NGA KORERO TUKU IHO, HELD AT WHAKARONGOTAI MARAE
WAIKANAE  22 APRIL 2015 CLICK BLUE LINK BELOW
April 2015 _Nga Korero Tuku Iho
WAI 88 & 89 AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM Dated 19 May 2016 CLICK BLUE LINK BELOW
WAI 88-89 Amended Statement of Claim
WAI 88 & 89  OF COUNSEL Dated 10 August 2016 - NEW TRUST - Ati Awa Mai Kukutauaki Ki Whareroa Trust” (AAMKKW) 
"The rohe under which this Trust is established is rooted in Nga Iwi o Ati Awa Ki Waikanae and the collective whanau/hapu of Te Atiawa, Ngati Tama, Ngati Mutunga and Ngati Maru
TRUSTEES: Anne Ngamate Parata, Hauangi Kiwha, Lois Ruhina McNaught, Mathew Love Parata, Albert George Ellison, Rewa Morgan, Karen Marama Parata.  CLICK BLUE LINK BELOW
It noticeable exclusion of two of the WAI 88 & 89 claimants Damian and Darrin Parata.
What is written in any of these documents legally cannot be assumed Damian and Darrin agree.  As there, names are not on new Trusts Registration. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Abusive, derogatory comments will not be posted. Only people who identify themselves comments will be considered for posting.